|
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/410287-fbis-smoking-gun-redactions-protected-political-embarrassment-not
[Why not?] [if true] D's do not want DECLAS [TO PROVE] POTUS was colluding w/ RUSSIA?
Why are D's opposed to DECLAS if what they say is true?
DECLAS would [PROVE] evidence v. POTUS to obtain FISA WARRANT - why the block?
Define 'Projection'.
See article above - redactions made to 'protect' exposing the REAL TRUTH?
Logical thinking.
McCabe Memos [source] >>> NYT [RR] 'wear a wire'
Sessions Subpoena >>> McCabe Memos delivery to House
Baker Testimony >>> House [what was learned?][D]
[Next Up][RR] Testimony >>> House
Locked & Loaded. |
ARCHIVE
THE HILL: FBI’s smoking-gun: Redactions protected political embarrassment, not ‘national security’
BY JOHN SOLOMON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 10/07/18 01:30 PM EDT
https://archive.fo/0XPMu |