|
You are witnessing the greatest ‘coordinated’ misinformation attack (campaign) ever to be launched against the public – all in an effort to protect themselves from prosecution (public exposure) and regain power (control).
[Attempted removal of the duly elected President of the United States by illegal [manufactured] means]
They believed they could win [con] public support by controlled assets (media, tech, H-wood…).
These controlled assets set out to immediately create division through the use of a pre_designed misinformation campaign.
Groups such as ‘Antifa’ were funded and formed to prevent and/or lessen the appeal for ‘regular’ hard working Americans to gather and express non_narrative viewpoints.
Control of this ‘projected narrative’ depends primarily on their ability to ‘con’ the masses into thinking they are the majority.
The mindset of most: If the majority of people believe ‘this’, than ‘this’ must be more true than ‘that’ [CIA_CLAS 1-99_56_Human_Psych_&_Emotional_Distress_IIED].
Without public support – they are powerless.
We, the People, hold the power.
UNITED WE ARE STRONG.
— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
You are witnessing the systematic destruction of the OLD GUARD. |
[CIA_CLAS 1-99_56_Human_Psych_&_Emotional_Distress_IIED]
Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED; sometimes called the tort of outrage)
[1] is a common law tort that allows individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual who intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an "extreme and outrageous" way.[2] Some courts and commentators have substituted mental for emotional, but the tort is the same.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_infliction_of_emotional_distress
Rationale for classification
IIED was created in tort law to address a problem that would arise when applying the common law form of assault. The common law tort of assault did not allow for liability when a threat of battery was not imminent. A common case would be a future threat of harm that would not constitute common law assault, but would nevertheless cause emotional harm to the recipient. IIED was created to guard against this kind of emotional abuse, thereby allowing a victim of emotional distress to receive compensation in situations where he or she would otherwise be barred from compensation under the common law form.
According to the first doctrine articulated by common law courts, a plaintiff could not recover for physical injury from fright alone absent a physical impact from an external source ("shock without impact"), even if the fright was proven to have resulted from a defendant's negligence, with the case on point referring to the negligent operation of a railroad.[3] Even with intentional conduct, absent material damage, claims for emotional harm were similarly barred. "Mental pain or anxiety, the law cannot value, and does not pretend to redress, when the unlawful act causes that alone. Though where a material damage occurs, and is connected with it, it is impossible a jury, in estimating it, should altogether overlook the feelings of the party interested."[4] Courts had been reluctant to accept a tort for emotional harm for fear of opening a "wide door" to frivolous claims.[5]
A change first occurred in the Irish courts which repudiated the English railroad decision and recognised liability for "nervous shock" in the Byrne (1884) and Bell (1890) cases [6] In England, the idea that physical/mental shock without impact from an external source should be a bar to recovery was first questioned at the Queen's Bench in Pugh v. London etc. Railroad Co.[7] In the following year, the Queen's Bench formally recognised the tort, for the first time, in the case of Wilkinson v Downton [1897] EWHC 1 (QB), [1897] 2 QB 57, although it was referred to as "intentional infliction of mental shock". Wilkinson has been subsequently approved by both the Court of Appeal (Janvier v Sweeney [1919] 2 KB 316) and House of Lords (Wainwright v Home Office [2003] UKHL 53, [2004] 2 AC 406). Citing Pugh and the Irish courts as precedent, the Wilkinson court noted the willful nature of the act as a direct cause of the harm.
MOAR ON IIED:
Was researching IIED due to Qs post. Said it was classified. I was like ok, we can’t get that. But if the CIA was researching IIED, they paid for it somehow through research centers, colleges, universities, etc. So i started looking for grants for research.
Found this:
https://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter_SearchResults.cfm?icde=45452921
adjusted the filter on the fiscal year (FY) to give me the oldest first, and got a ton of relevant hits. Too many links, and they are huge urls. I’ll give you the titles of the research and you can look them up yourself:
CEREBELLUM AND AUTISM: NEURAL MECHANISMS AND MODULATION OF PREDICTIVE PROCESSING
NEUROSPHYSIOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL STUDIES OF EXPECTANCY BIAS IN TRAUMA SURVIVORS
MODULATION OF FEAR CONDITIONING BY EXTENDED AMYGDALA CIRCUITS
PREPUBERTAL STRESS, WINDOWS OF RISK & SEX BIAS FOR AFFECTIVE DISTURBANCE
THE COGNITIVE THALAMUS: INFLUENCE ON PREFRONTAL CORTEX AND GOAL-DIRECTED BEHAVIOR
This is only a handful of the DOZENS of research projects along lines like these.
I propose to you that the 1-99 CLAS is actually 99 research programs which cumulatively builds a way to essentially brainwash a population using different techniques based upon these studies. All of these grants provide EXTREMELY detailed information regarding their research that you can find in each of the reports.
[UNABLE TO SAVE QUERY RESULTS ON ARCHIVE.S - IT JUST REVERTS TO BLANK QUERY -SA] |