#2938 at 2019-03-03 19:55:55 (UTC+1)
Ask yourself a very simple, logical, question.
What is a FISA warrant/application?
Is it a highly confidential [safeguarded] product of the UNITED STATES GOV?
If a product of the US GOV _ how did UK/AUS know what was listed inside of the package?
Think call to POTUS to prevent DECLAS [sources & methods].
If the US GOV requests UK/AUS [+2] to spy [+ campaign insertion] on an AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL PRE_NOMINEE + POTUS ELECT, is there a CHAIN OF COMMAND to APPROVE such AUTH?
Paper trail of the CHAIN OF COMMAND & umbrella spy metadata?
If not tasked & targeted under FVEY - what legal authority existed to engage the targeting?
Think Nunes' statement "not through normal collection, gathering, and reporting/oversight re: (FVEY)."
Did the dossier provide the 'bulk data' anchor for the spy campaign?
What entity paid for the 'research' dossier?
Opposition candidate?
What US Ally completed the collection of false data?
Why was it important to use sources within the UK vs. US?
How do you circumvent US LAW?
What other 'anchors' were provided to FISC in order to gain the warrant? [DECLAS will show].
Was the 'other' data (collection/process) worse than the dossier?
Why didn't FISC require 'in room' presentations of the data prior to 'sign off'?
Who signed apps 1-4?
Who traveled to UK/AUS post election of POTUS?
Why were SECURITY PRIV removed from select 'formerly active' individuals?
Treason-Sedition-Corruption at the highest levels of GOV (WW).
How do you repair a bridge without closing it down?
Q
|