|
https://twitter.com/brithume/status/1080929050120593410
What happens when all 'insiders' know the news is FAKE?
What happens when all 'insiders' know [AS] is the leak of false data?
What happens when a member of the House Intel Comm purposely leaks FAKE & FALSE data to 'friendly' news sources in order to maintain & portray a FALSE NARRATIVE to the public?
How do you build a case against a member of the House Intel Comm if they themselves have access to the intelligence?
What critical 'mission' did SESSIONS publicly announce re: leaks?
Why did SESSIONS make this PUBLIC?
Optics are important.
Control of the NARRATIVE.
TRUTH & TRANSPARENCY IS THE ONLY WAY FORWARD>
RE: MUELLER deleted 'critical' text messages between PS+LP?
Re_read Re: [MUELLER] designed to….
The 'MUELLER' insurance policy has expired.
[SCREENSHOT OF Q POST >>4093110 11-30-18 re: MUELLER 5:5?] |
filename: DtTs2t-X4AA7yJB.jpg
Sessions set the stage so that when little Adam Schiff dropped leaks they could be used to prosecute in an optically neutral manner.
ARCHIVE
BRIT HUME TWEET: http://archive.fo/NWFKz
TEXT -
On-the-record denials this sweeping and emphatic apparently caused some journalists not to write this story. The McClatchy guys went with it anyway, despite their sources’ refusal to be specific about what, exactly, was being investigated.
[Cleta Mitchell-McClatchy Email Correspondence]
https://www.scribd.com/document/387915015/Cleta-Mitchell-McClatchy-Email-Correspondence-Google-Docs
original image:
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/fbd77cb9f8c5d81727f739d2a0c975dabff21fd7afcf0d17945473e564a18e4c.jpg
direct link:
https://postimg.cc/WdP7MsNt |